Feed on
Posts
Comments

Like most high school students, I was forced to read Dickens. In my case, it was David Copperfield. Miss Henry, the quintessential spinster who taught Honor’s English at Poly High School in Riverside, California, was the prime mover. I can’t remember much about it, but I waded through the assigned pages without much enthusiasm. By the time I went to college I was ready to give it another try. For I did love to read, and I knew that if I loved books, I needed to read Dickens. So one day I went to the library and selected Great Expectations, mainly because it looked shorter than the others! I well remember curling up in a corner of the stacks, too excited to get started even to walk back to my dorm. I was smart, I was literate, I was going to love Dickens! After about fifty long, difficult pages, I put the book back on the shelf. I didn’t check it out, because I couldn’t imagine wading through the rest of it, and went home rather discouraged. If everybody thought Dickens was so great, what did they see that I wasn’t seeing?

It turned out that there wasn’t a big problem with Dickens, or with me as a reader. I just needed to grow up. A couple of years later I tried Dickens for the third time, and that time it clicked. I have been reading and rereading his books for nearly four decades now. I hoard my Dickens, savoring a novel every couple of years, and then revisiting it fifteen or twenty years later, when I will bring a different sensibility to it. This year, to celebrate the 200th anniversary of his birth, I wanted to reread David Copperfield, Dickens’s favorite of his novels, and the very first one I tried to tackle. I have just finished it, and I think it might be, word for word, the best novel ever written.

Perhaps it is a shame that we force Dickens on the young, because (at least for American children) his language is hard to follow. In this age of soundbites and 140-character Tweets, encountering a writer as wordy as Dickens can feel like body surfing a tsunami. Paid by the word, this writer of serial fiction always seems to take the long, scenic verbal route. If one adjective works, five or six are better! Yet, when you slow down and enjoy the ride, the verbal landscape is absolutely stunning. Dickens revels in observation; he sees everything, and he helps you see it too. His ability to inhabit each character, and then to show us the world through his or her eyes, is unparalleled in my opinion. Certain moments in the lives of these fictional creations will stay with you for years. When I read David Copperfield again this year, I couldn’t remember the events of the plot at some points, yet felt an ache in my heart begin to surface, as if in response to a long forgotten pain from my own life. I didn’t remember what was coming, but I remembered how I felt about it, over forty years ago. How does he do that? He does it by answering the one great question of literature: how does it feel? How does it feel to be abandoned, to be loved, to be ridiculed, to be hungry, to be in love, to want to die, to kill someone, and so on, through the endless myriad of human experiences. How does it feel to be human? To be you?

And that leads to one of the great secrets of Dickens’s enduring popularity: He seems to be talking just to you. Millions of readers, all over the world, hear his voice in their minds as they read, addressed directly to them. He really meant it to be that way. Long before the internet made reader reviews common, Dickens listened to his readers. He read their letters, responded to them, and in many cases, changed his works in progress in response to them. For example, Great Expectations has two endings, a melancholy one and, in response to objections from loyal readers, a happy one. (Order the Recorded Books audio version, and the great Frank Muller will read them both to you.) Miss Mowcher, a minor character in David Copperfield, was changed from a mercenary, conniving dwarf to a more innocent version in response to a letter written by a little person who felt vilified. This intimate approach makes Dickens seem modern and present even two hundred years later. There is a moment I love in A Christmas Carol where Dickens says, “I am standing, in spirit, right at your elbow.” Reading this line always gives me the chills, because I really feel that he is.

Described by Dickens as the favorite of his literary “children,” the best of Dickens is definitely in David Copperfield. The great characters, from the comic McCawber to the slimy reptilian villain Heap, will have you alternately laughing and seething with rage. The long, intricate symbolic chains, from the naming protocol to the use of the sea, give you something to think about long after the last scene fades. (Just tracing the number and meanings of names David is given has undoubtedly furnished fodder for a doctoral thesis somewhere.) Every social theme from domestic abuse to alcoholism to social injustice is touched upon in a way that makes you stop and rethink your position. And finally, there is the artistry. Dickens, when he is on a roll, writes some of the most beautiful prose in the English language. It’s not sound bites – it’s a feast.

By my twenties, I had lived just enough to see that Dickens had something special to share with me. In my fifties, I’m starting to get what he was talking about, and revel in the beauty of his language and insights. In my eighties, I hope I will understand him on a little deeper level. I won’t ever get tired of him, and I count his works as treasures that have enriched my life. G.K. Chesterton said, “There is everything in Dickens.” Yep, just about.


“The parents have eaten sour grapes, and the children’s teeth are set on edge.” Jeremiah 31:29

Parenting experts Richard and Linda Eyre recently wrote an insightful series of articles on the subject of entitlement, which over half of parents cited as the most disturbing problem with today’s youth. In a survey conducted by the Eyres, parents made the following statements about the attitude of entitlement so prevalent today:

“Kids feel they deserve everything and don’t have to earn anything.”
“It makes them disrespectful.”
“They don’t know how to work.”
“They think they have to have everything their friends have.”
“It’s the reason for all the other problems on the list, they think they can do whatever they want.”

“Entitlement leads to low motivation.”

The Eyres conclude, “Perhaps the biggest problem with entitlement is that under its illusions, there seem to be no real consequences in life and no motivation to work for anything. Someone will always bail you out, get you off the hook, buy you a new one, make excuses for you, give you another chance, pay your debt, and hand you what you ask for.
(Richard and Linda Eyre, The Biggest Kid-Problem Entitlement. http://www.ldsmag.com/component/zine/article/8211?ac=1)

It’s Not Just Our Problem

It turns out that a problem with entitlement is not unique to our baby-boom generation. In 1918, Booth Tarkington offered a striking example of the malady in his Pulitzer Prize winning novel, The Magnificent Ambersons. The Ambersons are the reigning family in an Indiana town at the turn of the century, but as the story opens their fortunes begin to change. The son and heir of the family, George Minever, is raised by doting parents and grandparents who spoil and pamper him and satisfy his every whim. As “Georgie” grows into a predictably annoying, selfish young man, the consequences of his upbringing grow more serious. And as the fortune of his parents and grandparents diminishes, their growing inability to cushion his excessive selfishness finally exposes him to the harsh realities of life.

While a distinctly drawn character study, George is a symbol as well, of a pampered, spoiled generation subsisting on the fruits of the former generation’s labor. Aping the aristocratic society in Europe, the rich children of the giants of the industrial revolution scorn honest labor and seek only to enjoy themselves and flaunt their wealth. Into this environment comes the representative of the next great societal wave in the person of Eugene Morgan, suitor to George’s widowed mother and founder of one of the first automobile factories. Inevitably, George clashes with Eugene, even as he falls in love with his daughter, causing the interesting, and often frustrating action of the novel.

Timeless and Timely

One of the things that makes this novel so intriguing is its narrative style: very Greek in nature, yet very American as well, as if Oedipus Rex were confronting Horatio Alger! One feels the sense of the timeless conflict between the son and the rival for his mother’s affections. Yet the novel is also firmly grounded in a certain period in American history, and reflects it so well that we feel a part of it. That combination of the timely and the timeless is a mark of a great work of literature. Here is a taste of Tarkington’s descriptive genius, as he paints a quaint picture of an old fashioned street car:

“There were the little bunty street-cars on the long, single track that went its troubled way among the cobble stones. At the rear door of the car there was no platform, but a step where passengers clung in wet clumps when the weather was bad and the car crowded.

“The patrons–if not too absent-minded–put their fares into a
slot; and no conductor paced the heaving floor, but the driver would rap
remindingly with his elbow upon the glass of the door to his little open
platform if the nickels and the passengers did not appear to coincide in
number. A lone mule drew the car, and sometimes drew it off the track,
when the passengers would get out and push it on again. They really owed it courtesies like this, for the car was genially accommodating: a lady could whistle to it from an upstairs window, and the car would halt at once and wait for her while she shut the window, put on her hat and cloak, went downstairs, found an umbrella, told the “girl” what to have for dinner, and came forth from the house.

“The previous passengers made little objection to such gallantry on the
part of the car: they were wont to expect as much for themselves on like
occasion. In good weather the mule pulled the car a mile in a little
less than twenty minutes, unless the stops were too long; but when the
trolley-car came, doing its mile in five minutes and better, it would
wait for nobody. Nor could its passengers have endured such a thing,
because the faster they were carried the less time they had to spare! In
the days before deathly contrivances hustled them through their lives,
and when they had no telephones–another ancient vacancy profoundly
responsible for leisure–they had time for everything: time to think, to
talk, time to read, time to wait for a lady!” (p. 3)

Though he is not well-known today, in 1922, after winning a second Pulitzer Prize, Tarkington was voted the greatest living American author and one of the ten greatest contemporary Americans. He was pleased with the first vote, yet declared with disarming modesty of the second, ‘You can’t say who are the 10 greatest with any more authority than you can say who are the 10 damndest fools.’

The next time we are tempted to give a kid the trophy just for showing up, or award the Merit Badges so that everybody in the troop gets to be an Eagle Scout, or pay for the damage because that child didn’t really mean to wreck the car, we might think of spoiled, dangerous Georgie. We don’t do our children any favors when we spoil them; instead we turn them into bitter, envious people who feel that somehow life has not treated them fairly, no matter how much they have. That’s the genius of the word “spoil” to describe what we do to children. We take the consequences of their bad behavior on ourselves in order to spare our children pain, yet by so doing set them up for greater suffering in the end. As the Bible says, “The parents have eaten sour grapes, and the children’s teeth are set on edge.”

Tags: , ,

I thought it might be good to take just one quarter, or three books, at a time this year, so that you can be aware of what’s coming, but also so that we can leave ourselves open to suggestions from you for classics to tackle later in the year. Here are our first three:

January: Our theme is Family First, and we’ll take a look at the Pulitzer Prize winning The Magnificent Ambersons, by Booth Tarkington. A fascinating and frustrating look at a family in decline in turn-of-the-century middle America.

February: Growing Pains is my way of referring to the coming-of-age novels about young women. I’ve had a hankering to reread Little Women, by Louisa May Alcott, and I want to invite you into that warm, wonderful world with me.

March: Boys to Men. Now it’s the boys’ turn for a coming-of-age story, and in honor of the 200th anniversary of Dickens’s birth let’s take on one of the greatest books ever written on that theme, David Copperfield. It was Dickens’s favorite and we’ll see why.

Here is a little video clip introducing these three books. I look forward to sharing them with you!

Welcome to the Best Books Club. Here are the rules:

1. Read my article about the book.

2. Read the book.

3. Send in a comment if you feel like it.

 

Yep, it’s that simple. Every month I’ll suggest a classic, following the twelve themes I used in my book, Back to the Best Books: How the Classics Can Change Your Life. I’ll try to give you an overview of the book, tell you a little about the author, and hopefully give you a few things to think about as you read. Then, I’ll look forward to hearing from you about the book or other books that fit into the theme we are discussing. Here is a little video clip to welcome you to the book club!

 

I’m not sure why Jane Austen’s books are so irresistable, but they are. They don’t seem like they should be. It’s not like anything much really happens. I mean, in six novels, there is a grand total of two kisses, both chaste and restrained. No sex, no violence, no grand world events. Austen prided herself on the very lack of excitement in her books. She advised a niece, “ Three or four families in a country village is the very thing to work on,” and that is just what she did. She followed her characters around the countryside, chronicling their romances and intrigues with restraint and humor, and somehow her characters came to life in such a way that we can never get enough of them.

Which brings me to my complaint: Could we please call a moratorium on Jane Austen rip-offs? Actually, the proper term is “Jane Austen Related Books.” Books shelved in libraries under this rather strange category include such wide-ranging titles as: Jane Austen Ruined My Life, Confessions of  a Jane Austen Addict, Jane Austen Made Me Do It, Austenland, Prom and Prejudice, and my personal favorite, Pride and Prejudice and Zombies.

Then there are all the books about Mr. Darcy. There is a whole “Gentlemen” series, and a score of other titles like A Weekend With Mr. Darcy and Mr. Darcy Broke My Heart. Ah, now we get to it. Mr. Darcy. What is it about that enigmatic gentleman that makes hearts flutter? (And would this generation be quite so enamored of him without Colin Firth’s performance in the beloved mini-series?) He’s self-righteous, rude and rarely cracks a smile, but we can’t get enough of Darcy. Many commentators have astutely mentioned a fourth “r” that may have been the crucial component that brought Elizabeth Bennett around, and that is “rich.” The guy is richer than Roosevelt, and there is something undeniably attractive about that, at least for Elizabeth, whose change of heart toward Darcy begins as she tours the grounds of his grand estate and realizes, “I might have been mistress of Pemberley.”

Well, whatever it is about Darcy and Elizabeth that we love, contemporary authors can’t leave them alone. And now P.D. James, renowned mystery writer and Dame of the British Empire, has published a murder mystery involving not just the characters from Pride and Prejudice, but a handful of folks from the other novels as well! I love P.D. James so much that I treasure every one of her books and, since she is 85 years old at least, I worry that each book she publishes will be her last. Her Adam Dalgleish series is fascinating; his character is a rare combination of poet and sleuth. When I saw that James had written a new mystery, Death Comes to Pemberley, I thought I had hit the jackpot! One of my favorite writers taking on one of my favorite writers. A win-win for sure!

Well, it didn’t work. In fact, this Jane Austen channeling never seems to work – even P.D. James can’t do it! Death Comes to Pemberley is certainly deadly, but not from an excess of murder and mayhem. It’s just plain stuffy and boring. Though it’s accurate in every detail, and shows an impressive command of the entire Austen ouvre, one ends up unable to care much one way or the other. All of the scintillating chemistry between Elizabeth and Darcy has turned to stilted conversations between two conventional people who talk in Austen’s style but without the underlying fizz and bubble that makes Austen a constant delight. I slogged through it, hoping it would get better, and it only got worse. What possesses these authors? Why don’t they just write their own books?

The only exception to this rule (the rule being two-fold 1. don’t mimic famous authors and 2. come up with your own dang characters) might be the hilarious Bridget Jones’ Diary. It’s about as far from Austen as you could ever get, yet somehow more in the spirit of what she really was trying to do than this stuffy drawing room conversation I just waded through.

Well, I’d like to keep an open mind about this genre, since it’s pretty huge right now. Somebody told me Wild Sargasso Sea (an offshoot of Jane Eyre, about the first Mrs. Rochester) was well done. I might even have read it but can’t remember. Anybody else have a good experience with a classic offshoot?  I must say, I did love the first line of Pride and Prejudice and Zombies: “It is a truth universally acknowledged that a zombie in possession of brains must be in want of more brains.” Unfortunately, it all goes downhill from there.

Help me out here – find me a “Austen or Bronte or Shakespeare Related” book that works!

Let’s make a list, and check it twice.

Tags: , , ,

Ah, the Holidays. While it is a wonderful time in general, the specifics can really get you down! For example, what do you get your gadget-loving brother-in-law that he hasn’t already bought himself? Or how about your parents, who say they don’t want anything, but still are going to feel bad if you really don’t get them anything? I’ve got the answer for you: get them a Bundle of Joy. Continue Reading »

This is an essay that I wrote in the night following the attacks on the Twin Towers.

September 12, 2001. It is three o’clock in the morning. I trust that many of you are also awake, reliving in your minds the events of this week, images that put our nightmares to shame. In the midst of our horror and anger we feel a terrible curiosity about this enemy that has shattered our peace and security. Who are these terrible people and why won’t they leave us alone? Colin Powell has described these atrocities as “an attack on civilization.” Yet our attackers, though ruthless barbarians, are also well funded, well trained and well educated. “We have a thinking enemy,” he said today. Continue Reading »

I mentioned on my Facebook page that I have been visiting book groups lately – several groups have purchased my book and are using it for a reading guide – and that if I am close enough I’d be glad to schedule more visits. A friend wrote to ask what books are in the reading guide, and of course I asked her why she hadn’t yet coughed up a few bucks and bought the book!?! Well, even if you haven’t bought the book, I’m going to put the Table of Contents right here so that you’ll know what books are in it!

If your book group members would like to buy the book, contact me and I’ll bundle you up a package at a discount. With that nifty flat rate box from the Post Office, I can ship you a dozen of them pretty darn cheap. So email me at bbooksclub@gmail.com and I’ll get you all fixed up. And, if you are in Southern California or the Salt Lake City area, I’d be glad to come and speak to your group in person. It’s fun to talk about books, wherever and whenever we can…

Table of contents after the jump. Continue Reading »


“Sometimes it’s a sort of indulgence to think the worst of ourselves. We say, ‘Now I have reached the bottom of the pit, now I can fall no further,’ and it is almost a pleasure to wallow in the darkness. The trouble is, it’s not true. There is no end to the evil in ourselves, just as there is no end to the good. It’s a matter of choice. We struggle to climb, or we struggle to fall. The thing is to discover which way we’re going.”

This brief quote by Daphne du Maurier encapsulates, for me, her allure as a writer. It’s hard to find an actual villain in a du Maurier novel. Even when the “villain” is revealed, the reader has been forced to question the motives and actions of everyone in the story. We are tempted to say, with Pogo, “we have met the enemy, and he is us.” In her stories Du Maurier created an amalgem of mystery, thriller and horror, with a dash of the paranormal thrown in, that is always unsettling. Hitchcock filmed three of her works: “The Birds,” Jamaica Inn and her most famous novel, Rebecca, which won the Oscar for Best Picture in 1941. Continue Reading »

Tags: , , , , , ,

If you love books, or history, or England, or (like me) all three, studying at Oxford is – well – it’s:

 

 

The breathtaking Christ Church quad, off limits for the most part to visitors. Entering it is a sudden haven after the tourist-mobbed streets. The guards stroll about in their bowler hats and you feel as if you had dropped off the edge of the 21st century. Since so many of the locations here were used in Harry Potter, there are hundreds of curious teens lurking around the edges of Christ Church. It’s fun to see them, but also fun to escape them!

 

 

 

 

Continue Reading »

Older Posts »